On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
> >> accommodate completion of thin packs. Given that the main SHA1 ta
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
>> accommodate completion of thin packs. Given that the main SHA1 table is
>> now in the main pack file, it should
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Nicolas Pitre writes:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> > Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
> >> > accommodate completion of thin packs.
Nicolas Pitre writes:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
>> > accommodate completion of thin packs. Given that the main SHA1 table is
>> > now in the main
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
> accommodate completion of thin packs. Given that the main SHA1 table is
> now in the main pack file, it should be possible to still carry a small
> SHA1 table in the in
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
> > accommodate completion of thin packs. Given that the main SHA1 table is
> > now in the main pack file, it should be possibl
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> > Many other bugs have now been fixed. A git.git repository with packs
> >> > version 4 app
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > Many other bugs have now been fixed. A git.git repository with packs
>> > version 4 appears to be functional and passes git-fsck --full --
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Many other bugs have now been fixed. A git.git repository with packs
> > version 4 appears to be functional and passes git-fsck --full --strict.
>
> Yeah I was looking at the diff some minutes ago,
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Many other bugs have now been fixed. A git.git repository with packs
> version 4 appears to be functional and passes git-fsck --full --strict.
Yeah I was looking at the diff some minutes ago, saw changes in
pack-check.c and wondering if fsc
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> So... looks like pack v4 is now "functional".
> >>
> >> However something is still wrong as it operates about 6 times slower
> >> than pack v3.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> So... looks like pack v4 is now "functional".
>>
>> However something is still wrong as it operates about 6 times slower
>> than pack v3.
>>
>> Anyone wishes to investigate?
>
> You recurse
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> So... looks like pack v4 is now "functional".
>
> However something is still wrong as it operates about 6 times slower
> than pack v3.
>
> Anyone wishes to investigate?
You recurse in decode_entries too deep.I check the first 1
decode_ent
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> > ---
> > Incorporated suggestions by Nico and Junio. I went ahead and added
> > escape hatches for converting thin packs to full ones so the document
>
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> ---
> Incorporated suggestions by Nico and Junio. I went ahead and added
> escape hatches for converting thin packs to full ones so the document
> does not really match the code (I've been watching Nico
15 matches
Mail list logo