Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect start: existing
.git/BISECT_START
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Just to be sure: other here is not a hardcoded message bisecting
other, but an instance of bisecting branch-name with the branch
being called other.
OK, then I do not have any objection. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect start: existing
.git/BISECT_START not modified if
cp .git/BISECT_START saved
test_must_fail git bisect start
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect start: existing
.git/BISECT_START not modified if
cp .git/BISECT_START
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Yeah, I do not think bisecting other alone makes much sense.
What does other refer to when you start your bisection at a
detached head? I personally think other has _any_ value in that
s/_any_/_no_/; obviously ;-)
message, because (no branch,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect start: existing
.git/BISECT_START not modified
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
* foo (rebasing)
Well, this one does not make sense (or causes more confusion).
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
7 matches
Mail list logo