On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > However this means that the progress meter will now be wrong and that's
> > terrible ! Users *will* complain that the meter doesn't reach 100% and
> > they'll protest for being denied the remaining
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> However this means that the progress meter will now be wrong and that's
> terrible ! Users *will* complain that the meter doesn't reach 100% and
> they'll protest for being denied the remaining objects during the
> transfer !
>
> Joking asid
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Nicolas Pitre writes:
>
> > Do we know the actual number of objects to send during the capability
> > negociation?
>
> No, and that is not what I meant. We know upfront after capability
> negotiation (by seeing a request to give them a thin-pack) th
Nicolas Pitre writes:
> Do we know the actual number of objects to send during the capability
> negociation?
No, and that is not what I meant. We know upfront after capability
negotiation (by seeing a request to give them a thin-pack) that we
will send, in addition to the usual packfile, the p
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Nicolas Pitre writes:
>
> >> > ... I was
> >> > wondering if some kind of prefix to the pack stream could be inserted
> >> > onto the wire when sending a pack v4. Something like:
> >> >
> >> > 'T', 'H', 'I', 'N',
> >> >
> >> > This 8-byte prefix w
Nicolas Pitre writes:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
>> nr_objects in the next patch is used to reflect the number of actual
>> objects in the stream, which may be smaller than the number recorded
>> in pack header.
>
> This highlights an issue that has been nagging me for a
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Nicolas Pitre writes:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> >
> >> nr_objects in the next patch is used to reflect the number of actual
> >> objects in the stream, which may be smaller than the number recorded
> >> in pack header.
> >
Nicolas Pitre writes:
>> > ... I was
>> > wondering if some kind of prefix to the pack stream could be inserted
>> > onto the wire when sending a pack v4. Something like:
>> >
>> > 'T', 'H', 'I', 'N',
>> >
>> > This 8-byte prefix would simply be discarded by index-pack after being
>> > pars
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> nr_objects in the next patch is used to reflect the number of actual
> objects in the stream, which may be smaller than the number recorded
> in pack header.
This highlights an issue that has been nagging me for a while.
We decided to send the fi
9 matches
Mail list logo
