Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Fix tests under GETTEXT_POISON on git-remote

2012-08-27 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com writes:

 Use i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for git-remote.
 This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10-233-gbb16d5:

 bb16d5 i18n: remote: mark strings for translation

 and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.

 Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com
 Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
 ---
 ...
 @@ -77,6 +75,14 @@ test_expect_success 'add another remote' '
  )
  '
  
 +test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT 'add another remote' '
 +(
 + cd test 
 + check_remote_track origin master side 
 + check_remote_track second master side another 
 +)
 +'

This couldn't have possibly passed with the trailing , or am I
missing something?  There is already add another remote before
this test that adds second remote.  Is this test about add
yet another remote, or is it checking the result of adding second
that was done in the previous step?

Will queue with an obvious fix-up with retitle, 'check tracking', or
something.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Fix tests under GETTEXT_POISON on git-remote

2012-08-27 Thread Jiang Xin
2012/8/28 Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com:
 Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com writes:

 Use i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for git-remote.
 This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10-233-gbb16d5:

 bb16d5 i18n: remote: mark strings for translation

 and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.

 Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin worldhello@gmail.com
 Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
 ---
 ...
 @@ -77,6 +75,14 @@ test_expect_success 'add another remote' '
  )
  '

 +test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT 'add another remote' '
 +(
 + cd test 
 + check_remote_track origin master side 
 + check_remote_track second master side another 
 +)
 +'

 This couldn't have possibly passed with the trailing , or am I
 missing something?  There is already add another remote before
 this test that adds second remote.  Is this test about add
 yet another remote, or is it checking the result of adding second
 that was done in the previous step?

The trailing “ is a copy  paste error. I only run my fixup in
GIT_GETTEXT_POISON mode in a harry, not noticed the bypassed
testcase has this serious bug.

I split the original add another remote into two blocks. One is a
normal testcase, and another has a C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prereq
flag. This is because other testcases depend on the operations in
add another remote testcase ('git remote add -f second ../two'),
and these testcases would fail if add C_LOCALE_OUTPUT
prereq to the whole add another remote testcase.


 Will queue with an obvious fix-up with retitle, 'check tracking', or
 something.

 Thanks.



-- 
蒋鑫

北京群英汇信息技术有限公司
邮件: worldhello@gmail.com
网址: http://www.ossxp.com/
博客: http://www.worldhello.net/
微博: http://weibo.com/gotgit/
电话: 010-51262007, 18601196889
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html