Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] rebase -i: write better reflog messages

2013-06-18 Thread Junio C Hamano
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes: diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh index 79e8d3c..f7d0147 100755 --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh @@ -934,6 +934,21 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase --edit-todo can be

Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] rebase -i: write better reflog messages

2013-06-18 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Junio C Hamano wrote: Why did this have to change back from branch-reflog-test to branch1 (which I used by mistake in how about this patch, but fixed in the version queued on 'pu')? The reason I did not use 'branch1' in the version I queued on 'pu' is because rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query,

Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] rebase -i: write better reflog messages

2013-06-18 Thread Junio C Hamano
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes: Junio C Hamano wrote: Why did this have to change back from branch-reflog-test to branch1 (which I used by mistake in how about this patch, but fixed in the version queued on 'pu')? The reason I did not use 'branch1' in the version I queued on

Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] rebase -i: write better reflog messages

2013-06-18 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Junio C Hamano wrote: Oh, okay. Then just tweak before applying, if you don't mind? Sorry, you've already used my time allotment for this week. No worries, I'll re-roll. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More