On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 04/19/2017 01:01 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> This is a better place that will benefit all submodule callers instead
>> of just resolve_gitlink_ref()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
On 04/19/2017 01:01 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> This is a better place that will benefit all submodule callers instead
> of just resolve_gitlink_ref()
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> ---
> refs.c | 33 +
> 1 file changed, 17
Am 20.04.2017 um 13:56 schrieb Duy Nguyen:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
What is the source of the value of 'submodule'? Is it an index entry? Or did
it pass through parse_pathspec? In these cases it is correct to compare
against literal '/'. Otherwise,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 19.04.2017 um 13:01 schrieb Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy:
>>
>> @@ -1558,7 +1543,17 @@ struct ref_store *get_submodule_ref_store(const
>> char *submodule)
>> {
>> struct strbuf submodule_sb = STRBUF_INIT;
>> struct
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:02:08AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 19.04.2017 um 13:01 schrieb Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy:
> > @@ -1558,7 +1543,17 @@ struct ref_store *get_submodule_ref_store(const char
> > *submodule)
> > {
> > struct strbuf submodule_sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> > struct ref_store
Am 19.04.2017 um 13:01 schrieb Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy:
@@ -1558,7 +1543,17 @@ struct ref_store *get_submodule_ref_store(const char
*submodule)
{
struct strbuf submodule_sb = STRBUF_INIT;
struct ref_store *refs;
+ char *to_free = NULL;
int ret;
+ size_t len;
+
6 matches
Mail list logo