Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:

> A future caller of read_and_refresh_cache() may want to do more than just
> print some helpful advice in case of failure.

I recall commenting on unreleased locks on other parts of the series
but didn't see this.  Looks good.  Thanks for being thorough.

> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index d92a632..eec8a60 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -644,14 +644,18 @@ static int read_and_refresh_cache(struct replay_opts 
> *opts)
>  {
>       static struct lock_file index_lock;
>       int index_fd = hold_locked_index(&index_lock, 0);
> -     if (read_index_preload(&the_index, NULL) < 0)
> +     if (read_index_preload(&the_index, NULL) < 0) {
> +             rollback_lock_file(&index_lock);
>               return error(_("git %s: failed to read the index"),
>                       action_name(opts));
> +     }
>       refresh_index(&the_index, REFRESH_QUIET|REFRESH_UNMERGED, NULL, NULL, 
> NULL);
>       if (the_index.cache_changed && index_fd >= 0) {
> -             if (write_locked_index(&the_index, &index_lock, COMMIT_LOCK))
> +             if (write_locked_index(&the_index, &index_lock, COMMIT_LOCK)) {
> +                     rollback_lock_file(&index_lock);
>                       return error(_("git %s: failed to refresh the index"),
>                               action_name(opts));
> +             }
>       }
>       rollback_lock_file(&index_lock);
>       return 0;

Reply via email to