Am 29.08.2013 21:54, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
> Am 29.08.2013 15:05, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
>> The --for-status option was an undocumented option used only by
>> wt-status.c, which inserted a header and commented out the output. We can
>> achieve the same result within wt-status.c, without polluting th
Am 31.08.2013 19:08, schrieb brian m. carlson:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:08:53PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
>> Am 30.08.2013 21:51, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
>>> Am 30.08.2013 21:40, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
Am 29.08.2013 23:23, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
> Jens Lehmann writes:
>
>> Am 29.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:08:53PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Am 30.08.2013 21:51, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
> > Am 30.08.2013 21:40, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
> >> Am 29.08.2013 23:23, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
> >>> Jens Lehmann writes:
> >>>
> Am 29.08.2013 15:05, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
> >>> Because
Am 29.08.2013 23:23, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
> Jens Lehmann writes:
>
>> Am 29.08.2013 15:05, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
>>> The --for-status option was an undocumented option used only by
>>> wt-status.c, which inserted a header and commented out the output. We can
>>> achieve the same result within wt
Am 30.08.2013 21:40, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
> Am 29.08.2013 23:23, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
>> Jens Lehmann writes:
>>
>>> Am 29.08.2013 15:05, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
The --for-status option was an undocumented option used only by
wt-status.c, which inserted a header and commented out the out
Am 30.08.2013 21:51, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
> Am 30.08.2013 21:40, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
>> Am 29.08.2013 23:23, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
>>> Jens Lehmann writes:
>>>
Am 29.08.2013 15:05, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
> The --for-status option was an undocumented option used only by
> wt-status.c
Jens Lehmann writes:
> Am 29.08.2013 15:05, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
>> The --for-status option was an undocumented option used only by
>> wt-status.c, which inserted a header and commented out the output. We can
>> achieve the same result within wt-status.c, without polluting the
>> submodule comma
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Matthieu Moy writes:
>
>> +/* prepend header, only if there's an actual output */
>> +if (len) {
>> +if (uncommitted)
>> +strbuf_addstr(&summary, _("Submodules changed but not
>> updated:"));
>> +else
>> +
Matthieu Moy writes:
> + /* prepend header, only if there's an actual output */
> + if (len) {
> + if (uncommitted)
> + strbuf_addstr(&summary, _("Submodules changed but not
> updated:"));
> + else
> + strbuf_addstr(&summary
Am 29.08.2013 15:05, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
> The --for-status option was an undocumented option used only by
> wt-status.c, which inserted a header and commented out the output. We can
> achieve the same result within wt-status.c, without polluting the
> submodule command-line options.
>
> This wi
10 matches
Mail list logo