Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] submodule update: add --remote for submodule's upstream changes

2012-12-02 Thread Jens Lehmann
Am 30.11.2012 04:27, schrieb W. Trevor King: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:11:20PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote: But I really don't want to figure out how to handle submodule

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] submodule update: add --remote for submodule's upstream changes

2012-11-29 Thread W. Trevor King
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:11:20PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote: > >> For that reason, I don't like the --pull switch since it implies a > >> fetch, but I will not always want to do a

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] submodule update: add --remote for submodule's upstream changes

2012-11-29 Thread Phil Hord
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:54 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: >> > [snip initial thoughts leading to the update --remote v5] >> >> I was thinking the same thing, but reading this who

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] submodule update: add --remote for submodule's upstream changes

2012-11-29 Thread W. Trevor King
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:54 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > > [snip initial thoughts leading to the update --remote v5] > > I was thinking the same thing, but reading this whole thread a couple of > weeks late. Thanks for noticing. > >