Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: > It is technically allowed, as per C89, for functions' return type to > be complete structs (i.e. *not* just pointers to structs). > > However, it was just an oversight of this developer when converting > Python code to C code in 6d297f8 (Status update on merge-recursive in > C, 2006-07-08) which introduced such a return type. > > Besides, by converting this construct to pass in the struct, we can now > start returning a value that can indicate errors in future patches. This > will help the current effort to libify merge-recursive.c.
I do not think returning a small struct by value is unconditionally a bad thing, but I do agree with you that this change makes the resulting code much easier to read, especially once this starts returning errors. Good. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
