Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Did anything further happen to this discussion? Is v3 the version
with agreement among the list members I just should pick up?
v3
( http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/235409/focus=235408 )
is the last version I sent, and I got no
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
v3
( http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/235409/focus=235408 )
is the last version I sent, and I got no feedback on it, so I guess it's
ready for you to pick.
Thanks; done with s/pick/nitpick/ ;-).
--
To unsubscribe from
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
has_dash_dash is calculated as (argc 1) !strcmp(argv[1], --),
so when argc == 1, the has_dash_dash must be zero, the
!has_dash_dash is redundant.
Yes, but I'd rather not have to read the detailed
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Matthieu Moy matthieu@imag.fr wrote:
static int parse_branchname_arg(int argc, const char **argv,
int dwim_new_local_branch_ok,
struct branch_info *new,
You may want to update the big comment
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
@@ -925,7 +926,15 @@ static int parse_branchname_arg(int argc, const char
**argv,
return 1;
arg = argv[0];
- has_dash_dash = (argc 1) !strcmp(argv[1], --);
+
5 matches
Mail list logo
