Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase -i: use full onto sha1 in reflog

2012-08-09 Thread Junio C Hamano
Martin von Zweigbergk  writes:

> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Michael J Gruber
>  wrote:
>> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
>> index 0d2056f..dbc9de6 100644
>> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
>> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
>> @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ do_next () {
>> newhead=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
>> case $head_name in
>> refs/*)
>> -   message="$GIT_REFLOG_ACTION: $head_name onto $shortonto" &&
>> +   message="$GIT_REFLOG_ACTION: $head_name onto $onto" &&
>
> After this patch, is there any point in the
>
>  shortonto=$(git rev-parse --short $onto) &&
>
> line just before the context? (I can't see any.)

Good point; the function always exits after reaching this point, so
it should be safe to omit it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase -i: use full onto sha1 in reflog

2012-08-09 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael J Gruber  writes:

> 'git rebase' uses the full onto sha1 for the reflog message whereas 'git
> rebase -i' uses the short sha1. This is not only inconsistent, but can
> lead to problems when the reflog is inspected at a later time at which
> that abbreviation may have become ambiguous.
>
> Make 'rebase -i' use the full onto sha1, as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber 
> ---
> I don't remember having sent this out before but have been running with
> it since (including tests). I don't see it on the list either.
>
> While not for 1.7.12 obviously, it might still be good to have.

Makes sense, I agree it is not that urgent to include it in 1.7.12,
and I think it is not just "good to have" but "we should have done
so from day one and it cannot break anybody who is reading the
reflog".

Thanks.

>
>  git-rebase--interactive.sh | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> index 0d2056f..dbc9de6 100644
> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ do_next () {
>   newhead=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
>   case $head_name in
>   refs/*)
> - message="$GIT_REFLOG_ACTION: $head_name onto $shortonto" &&
> + message="$GIT_REFLOG_ACTION: $head_name onto $onto" &&
>   git update-ref -m "$message" $head_name $newhead $orig_head &&
>   git symbolic-ref \
> -m "$GIT_REFLOG_ACTION: returning to $head_name" \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase -i: use full onto sha1 in reflog

2012-08-09 Thread Martin von Zweigbergk
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Michael J Gruber
 wrote:
> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> index 0d2056f..dbc9de6 100644
> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ do_next () {
> newhead=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
> case $head_name in
> refs/*)
> -   message="$GIT_REFLOG_ACTION: $head_name onto $shortonto" &&
> +   message="$GIT_REFLOG_ACTION: $head_name onto $onto" &&

After this patch, is there any point in the

 shortonto=$(git rev-parse --short $onto) &&

line just before the context? (I can't see any.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html