Hey Junio,
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Pranit Bauva writes:
>
>> Hey Junio,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Pranit Bauva writes:
>>>
> Also
Pranit Bauva writes:
> Hey Junio,
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Pranit Bauva writes:
>>
Also you do not seem to check the error from the function to smudge
the "result" you are returning
Hey Junio,
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Pranit Bauva writes:
>
>>> Also you do not seem to check the error from the function to smudge
>>> the "result" you are returning from this function.
>>
>> Yes I should combine the
Pranit Bauva writes:
>> Also you do not seem to check the error from the function to smudge
>> the "result" you are returning from this function.
>
> Yes I should combine the results from every removal.
>
>> Isn't unlink_or_warn() more correct helper to use here?
>
> The
Hey Junio,
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Pranit Bauva writes:
>
>> +static int bisect_clean_state(void)
>> +{
>> + int result = 0;
>> +
>> + /* There may be some refs packed during bisection */
>> + struct
Pranit Bauva writes:
> +static int bisect_clean_state(void)
> +{
> + int result = 0;
> +
> + /* There may be some refs packed during bisection */
> + struct string_list refs_for_removal = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
> + for_each_ref_in("refs/bisect/",
6 matches
Mail list logo