Re: [RFC] Another way to provide help details. (was Re: [PATCH] Add help details to git help command.)

2005-04-19 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:41:34PM CEST, I got a letter where David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > If Petr wants the top comment to be extracted by help then maybe a > bottom comment block could contain the more complete text? > I *really* think that the user docs should

Re: [RFC] Another way to provide help details. (was Re: [PATCH] Add help details to git help command.)

2005-04-19 Thread Steven Cole
David Greaves wrote: Petr Baudis wrote: Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:40:54AM CEST, I got a letter where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... Here is perhaps a better way to provide detailed help for each git command. A command.help file for each command can be written in the s

Re: [RFC] Another way to provide help details. (was Re: [PATCH] Add help details to git help command.)

2005-04-19 Thread David Greaves
Petr Baudis wrote: Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:40:54AM CEST, I got a letter where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... Here is perhaps a better way to provide detailed help for each git command. A command.help file for each command can be written in the style of a man page.

Re: [RFC] Another way to provide help details. (was Re: [PATCH] Add help details to git help command.)

2005-04-18 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:40:54AM CEST, I got a letter where Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > Here is perhaps a better way to provide detailed help for each > git command. A command.help file for each command can be > written in the style of a man page. I don't like