On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Karsten Blees wrote:
> Am 22.04.2014 12:35, schrieb Duy Nguyen:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
IIRC name_hash.c::lazy_init_name_hash took ~100ms on my system, so
hopefully you did a dummy 'cache_name_exists("anything")' before sta
Am 22.04.2014 12:35, schrieb Duy Nguyen:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>> IIRC name_hash.c::lazy_init_name_hash took ~100ms on my system, so
>>> hopefully you did a dummy 'cache_name_exists("anything")' before starting
>>> the measurement of the first run?
>>
>> No I didn
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> IIRC name_hash.c::lazy_init_name_hash took ~100ms on my system, so hopefully
>> you did a dummy 'cache_name_exists("anything")' before starting the
>> measurement of the first run?
>
> No I didn't. Thanks for pointing it out. I'll see if I ca
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Karsten Blees wrote:
> Am 17.04.2014 07:51, schrieb Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy:
>> This patch serves as a heads up about a feature I'm working on. I hope
>> that by posting it early, people could double check if I have made
>> some fundamental mistakes that completely ru
Am 17.04.2014 07:51, schrieb Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy:
> This patch serves as a heads up about a feature I'm working on. I hope
> that by posting it early, people could double check if I have made
> some fundamental mistakes that completely ruin the idea. It's about
> speeding up "git status" by cachin
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>
>>first run second (cached) run
>> gentoo-x86500 ms 71.6 ms
>> wine 140 ms 9.72 ms
>> webkit125 ms 6.88 ms
>> linux-2.6 106 ms
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>first run second (cached) run
> gentoo-x86500 ms 71.6 ms
> wine 140 ms 9.72 ms
> webkit125 ms 6.88 ms
> linux-2.6 106 ms 16.2 ms
>
> Basically untracked time is cut to one tent
7 matches
Mail list logo
