On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
This is the culmination of the last few commits. Since some callers
want to store refnames in the name field of object_array elements, but
we don't want those callers to assume that the refnames that they got
from
On 05/20/2013 12:33 PM, Johan Herland wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
wrote:
This is the culmination of the last few commits. Since some callers
want to store refnames in the name field of object_array elements, but
we don't want those callers
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:42:38PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
* Many callers store the empty string () as the name; for example,
most of the entries created during a run of rev-list have as
their name. This means that lots of needless copies of are being
made. I think that
On 05/20/2013 06:44 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:42:38PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
* Many callers store the empty string () as the name; for example,
most of the entries created during a run of rev-list have as
their name. This means that lots of needless copies
4 matches
Mail list logo