On Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:19:23 -0700
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Tan writes:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
> > ---
> > builtin/count-objects.c | 1 +
> > cache.h | 8 ---
> > pack.c | 149
> >
> > pack.h | 8 +++
> > sha1_file.c | 140 -
> > sha1_name.c | 1 +
> > 6 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
>
> This patch is a bit strange...
>
> > diff --git a/pack.c b/pack.c
> > index 60d9fc3b0..6edc43228 100644
> > --- a/pack.c
> > +++ b/pack.c
> > ...
> > +static struct packed_git *alloc_packed_git(int extra)
> > +{
> > + struct packed_git *p = xmalloc(st_add(sizeof(*p), extra));
> > + memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
> > + p->pack_fd = -1;
> > + return p;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct packed_git *parse_pack_index(unsigned char *sha1, const char
> > *idx_path)
> > +{
> > + const char *path = sha1_pack_name(sha1);
> > + size_t alloc = st_add(strlen(path), 1);
> > + struct packed_git *p = alloc_packed_git(alloc);
> > +
> > + memcpy(p->pack_name, path, alloc); /* includes NUL */
> > + hashcpy(p->sha1, sha1);
> > + if (check_packed_git_idx(idx_path, p)) {
> > + free(p);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return p;
> > +}
>
> We see these two functions appear in pack.c
>
> > diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
> > index 0de39f480..2e414f5f5 100644
> > --- a/sha1_file.c
> > +++ b/sha1_file.c
> > ...
> > @@ -1300,22 +1176,6 @@ struct packed_git *add_packed_git(const char *path,
> > size_t path_len, int local)
> > return p;
> > }
> >
> > -struct packed_git *parse_pack_index(unsigned char *sha1, const char
> > *idx_path)
> > -{
> > - const char *path = sha1_pack_name(sha1);
> > - size_t alloc = st_add(strlen(path), 1);
> > - struct packed_git *p = alloc_packed_git(alloc);
> > -
> > - memcpy(p->pack_name, path, alloc); /* includes NUL */
> > - hashcpy(p->sha1, sha1);
> > - if (check_packed_git_idx(idx_path, p)) {
> > - free(p);
> > - return NULL;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return p;
> > -}
> > -
>
> And we see parse_pack_index() came from sha1_file.c
>
> But where did alloc_packed_git() come from? Was the patch split
> incorrectly or something?
>
> When I applied the whole series and did
>
> git blame -s -w -M -C -C master.. pack.c
>
> expecting that pretty much everything has come from sha1_file.c but
> noticed that some lines were actually blamed to a version of pack.c
> and these functions were among them.
alloc_packed_git() in pack.c is a duplicate of the function of the same
name in sha1_file.c in this patch, because at this patch, there are
still functions in both files using this function. A subsequent patch in
this patch set will remove it from pack.c.
I'll add a note explaining this to this patch in the next version.