Re: 2.10.0: multiple versionsort.prereleasesuffix buggy?

2016-09-06 Thread SZEDER Gábor
Hi, Quoting Jeff King : On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 03:07:59AM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote: So that seems wrong. Even weirder, if I set _only_ "-beta", I get: $ git tag -l --sort=version:refname | grep -v ^2.6.0 2.6.0-beta-2 2.6.0-beta-3 2.6.0-beta-4 2.6.0 2.6.0-RC1

Re: 2.10.0: multiple versionsort.prereleasesuffix buggy?

2016-09-06 Thread Leho Kraav (Conversion Ready)
On 06.09.2016 04:07, SZEDER Gábor wrote: [versionsort] prereleasesuffix = beta prereleasesuffix = -beta prereleasesuffix = RC prereleasesuffix = -RC Best, Gábor Yes, yes you are the best. Workaround works, tyvm. I was heading in that direction, too, but never

Re: 2.10.0: multiple versionsort.prereleasesuffix buggy?

2016-09-05 Thread Jeff King
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 03:07:59AM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > > So that seems wrong. Even weirder, if I set _only_ "-beta", I get: > > > > $ git tag -l --sort=version:refname | grep -v ^2.6.0 > > 2.6.0-beta-2 > > 2.6.0-beta-3 > > 2.6.0-beta-4 > > 2.6.0 > > 2.6.0-RC1 > > 2.6.0-RC2

Re: 2.10.0: multiple versionsort.prereleasesuffix buggy?

2016-09-05 Thread SZEDER Gábor
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:42:28AM +0300, Leho Kraav (Conversion Ready) wrote: > > > Here's the testing tree https://github.com/woothemes/woocommerce > > > > .git/config has: > > > > [versionsort] > > > > > > prereleasesuffix = -beta > > prereleasesuffix = -RC > > > > $ git tag -l

Re: 2.10.0: multiple versionsort.prereleasesuffix buggy?

2016-09-05 Thread Jeff King
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:42:28AM +0300, Leho Kraav (Conversion Ready) wrote: > Here's the testing tree https://github.com/woothemes/woocommerce > > .git/config has: > > [versionsort] > > > prereleasesuffix = -beta > prereleasesuffix = -RC > > $ git tag -l --sort=version:refname >