Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Dimitar Bonev writes:
>
> [administrivia: please do not drop people out of Cc list]
>
> That invites another question: if it is very well related, why isn't
> it an option to start from the state you have in the working tree
> (i.e. doing nothing), or in the index (i.e. "g
Dimitar Bonev writes:
[administrivia: please do not drop people out of Cc list]
> Actually this is not the case as I tried to explain with the 'git
> commit' followed by 'git checkout HEAD~1 -- targetfile' followed by
> 'git commit --amend' example. The index and the working dir states are
> ver
Dimitar Bonev writes:
> One more argument against the suggestion of doing a commit ahead of
> time is that I like to think in separation to reduce complexity - in
> particular I like to think only for the working dir and index states,
> commits - I treat them as finished work. If I have to amend
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Is there no way to convince PowerShell to treat the output of a
> command as binary data with no particular encoding?
The best I could find out is to pipe the output to set-content:
git show HEAD:targetfile | set-content targetfile
The de
Junio C Hamano writes:
> "I have something worth saving, better than HEAD in some way
> (e.g. contains fixes), in my index. I want to keep it while I
> experiment an approach that is unrelated to it, so I want a clean
> slate in the working tree from HEAD without disturbing the index".
>
> At the
Thomas Rast writes:
>> I have been looking for such a command/option and no one gave me
>> sufficient answer. So this message should be considered as a feature
>> request. I had a situation where I had staged a file with a problem
>> solution in it, then I wanted to experiment with a different so
Dimitar Bonev wrote:
> @ThomasRast: 'git show HEAD:targetfile > targetfile' was proposed in
> the both links that I provided in the email that your replied to, but
> this introduces external dependency to the command interpreter to
> output the file unmodified but not every interpreter does this.
I think if there was such a command, it could well be common, at least
for me. I am somewhat surprised that from the three combinations of
resetting index and working dir's states of a file this is the one
that is missing (it is missing at commit level also for what is
worth). Summary table of res
Dimitar Bonev writes:
> I have been looking for such a command/option and no one gave me
> sufficient answer. So this message should be considered as a feature
> request. I had a situation where I had staged a file with a problem
> solution in it, then I wanted to experiment with a different solu
9 matches
Mail list logo
