Am 12.11.2013 23:20, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 12.11.2013 08:46, schrieb Johannes Sixt:
Am 11.11.2013 22:29, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
The diff below fixes the problem you describe for me. (But I do not
consider it a worthwhile fix in its current form
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
If we were introducing a divider line for machine consumption, I do
not think it is wise to let that line even translated...
Ok, but then it won't mean much to readers who don't understand
English. I assume prefixing all diff lines with # is out of
Am 12.11.2013 08:46, schrieb Johannes Sixt:
Am 11.11.2013 22:29, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
The diff below fixes the problem you describe for me. (But I do not
consider it a worthwhile fix in its current form because a line
starting with Submodule might appear in a perfectly normal commit
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 12.11.2013 08:46, schrieb Johannes Sixt:
Am 11.11.2013 22:29, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
The diff below fixes the problem you describe for me. (But I do not
consider it a worthwhile fix in its current form because a line
starting with Submodule might
Hi Ari,
Am 10.11.2013 22:49, schrieb Ari Pollak:
I'm using git 1.8.4.2, and I've set the diff.submodule = log option
globally. If I change the revision that a submodule is set to, then run
git commit -av, The submodule shortlog is appended to the log message
without
any #s before it, so
Jens Lehmann writes:
And after adding a modified file the log message also shows the diff of
that file (and without leading # s too), so I doubt that diffs aren't
normally included in the commit message with -v. What am I missing?
Ah, it is true that -v normally does not prefix the diffs with
Am 11.11.2013 21:48, schrieb Ari Pollak:
Jens Lehmann writes:
And after adding a modified file the log message also shows the diff of
that file (and without leading # s too), so I doubt that diffs aren't
normally included in the commit message with -v. What am I missing?
Ah, it is true that
Am 11.11.2013 22:29, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
And while testing this issue I noticed another problem: When using
git commit -a not only the staged commits of a submodule get
committed, but also the unstaged commits. Will look into that too.
Ok, scrap that. This is exactly what is expected.
--
To
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:29:25PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
The diff below fixes the problem you describe for me. (But I do not
consider it a worthwhile fix in its current form because a line
starting with Submodule might appear in a perfectly normal commit
message, while diff --git most
Am 11.11.2013 22:29, schrieb Jens Lehmann:
The diff below fixes the problem you describe for me. (But I do not
consider it a worthwhile fix in its current form because a line
starting with Submodule might appear in a perfectly normal commit
message, while diff --git most probably won't).
10 matches
Mail list logo