Re: Is anyone working on a next-gen Git protocol (Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Hiding refs)

2013-02-05 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > >> Do you have any plans for something that *does* have the reduction of >> network bandwidth as a primary goal? > > Uncluttering gives reduction of bandwidth anyway, so I do not see > much point in the dist

Re: Is anyone working on a next-gen Git protocol (Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Hiding refs)

2013-02-05 Thread Junio C Hamano
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > Do you have any plans for something that *does* have the reduction of > network bandwidth as a primary goal? Uncluttering gives reduction of bandwidth anyway, so I do not see much point in the distinction you seem to be making. > Is this what you've been workin

Re: Is anyone working on a next-gen Git protocol (Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Hiding refs)

2013-02-05 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The third round. > > - Multi-valued variable transfer.hiderefs lists prefixes of ref >hierarchies to be hidden from the requests coming over the >network. > > - A configuration optionally allows uploadpack to accept fetch >requ