Re: Premerging topics (was: [RFD] annnotating a pair of commit objects?)

2013-04-23 Thread Johan Herland
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Antoine Pelisse wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Johan Herland wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Antoine Pelisse wrote: >>> Data-structure >>> == >>> We could use a note ref to store the pre-merge information. Each commit >>> would

Re: Premerging topics (was: [RFD] annnotating a pair of commit objects?)

2013-04-23 Thread Antoine Pelisse
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Johan Herland wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Antoine Pelisse wrote: >> Data-structure >> == >> We could use a note ref to store the pre-merge information. Each commit >> would be annotated with a blob containing the list of pre-merges (one

Re: Premerging topics (was: [RFD] annnotating a pair of commit objects?)

2013-04-22 Thread Johan Herland
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Antoine Pelisse wrote: > The goal is to propose a structure for storing and pre-merging pairs of > commits. > > Data-structure > == > > We could use a note ref to store the pre-merge information. Each commit > would be annotated with a blob containing

Re: Premerging topics (was: [RFD] annnotating a pair of commit objects?)

2013-04-22 Thread Antoine Pelisse
Any comment on that ? I think anyone using a "Topic Workflow" could use that feature and that it would be a nice addition to the project. Maybe I'm totally wrong in the proposal below (please tell me !), but there are some unanswered question that prevents me from starting (and I'd really like this