David Turner writes:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 10:14 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> David Turner writes:
>>
>> > RFC follows:
>> >
>> > 1. On a case-insensitive server, git receive-pack ought to always reject
>> > branches which are same-but-for-case of existing branches.
>> > 2. On a case-sensi
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 10:14 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Turner writes:
>
> > RFC follows:
> >
> > 1. On a case-insensitive server, git receive-pack ought to always reject
> > branches which are same-but-for-case of existing branches.
> > 2. On a case-sensitive server, the same rule by de
David Turner writes:
> RFC follows:
>
> 1. On a case-insensitive server, git receive-pack ought to always reject
> branches which are same-but-for-case of existing branches.
> 2. On a case-sensitive server, the same rule by default, with an option
> to allow the old behavior.
>
> Let me know if,
3 matches
Mail list logo