Re: Re: SHA1 hash safety

2005-04-16 Thread David Lang
rnel.org Subject: Re: Re: SHA1 hash safety On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: I know the current state of the art here. It's going to take more than just hearsay to convince me that full 128-bit MD5 collisions are likely. http://cryptography.hyperlink.cz/MD5_collisions.html OK, OK, I spoke t

Re: Re: SHA1 hash safety

2005-04-16 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: I know the current state of the art here. It's going to take more than just hearsay to convince me that full 128-bit MD5 collisions are likely. http://cryptography.hyperlink.cz/MD5_collisions.html OK, OK, I spoke too sloppily. Let me rephrase: It's going

Re: Re: SHA1 hash safety

2005-04-16 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 04:58:15PM CEST, I got a letter where "C. Scott Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Brian O'Mahoney wrote: > > >(1) I _have_ seen real-life collisions with MD5, in the context of > > Document management systems containing ~10^6