Re: Should cg-mkpatch output be usable with cg-patch?

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I wander what I should do with cg-mkpatch generated output; I had the impression that this should be usable with cg-patch, but these are incompatible with each other. They certainly aren't. Is this a problem with the current implementation, or

Re: Should cg-mkpatch output be usable with cg-patch?

Dear diary, on Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 07:50:18PM CEST, I got a letter where Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I wander what I should do with cg-mkpatch generated output; I had the impression that this should be usable with cg-patch,

Re: Should cg-mkpatch output be usable with cg-patch?

Dear diary, on Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:57:49AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... I only briefly looked at cg-patch, but I suspect that it can lose 90% lines of its code by just using git-apply --index. Can git-apply already deal with fuzzy patches? --

Re: Should cg-mkpatch output be usable with cg-patch?

Dear diary, on Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:49:04AM CEST, I got a letter where Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... I wander what I should do with cg-mkpatch generated output; I had the impression that this should be usable with cg-patch, but these are incompatible with each other.