Re: The state of the object store series

2018-06-22 Thread Jonathan Tan
> I'm waiting for sb/object-store-lookup to be in 'next' before I re-roll > that branch. If you're not in a rush to send this series, perhaps wait > for the next version here. Did you mean another branch? I'm looking at https://github.com/gitster/git right now, and I see

Re: The state of the object store series

2018-06-21 Thread Derrick Stolee
[My email client says I sent this two days ago, but it doesn't appear on public-inbox.org, so somehow it didn't land on-list (Stefan pointed out that the message was in HTML). Repeating the message now so I can reference it in another discussion. -Stolee] On 6/19/2018 6:07 PM, Stefan Beller

Re: The state of the object store series

2018-06-20 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:09 AM Stefan Beller wrote: > "xx/convert-revision-walking" > This series aims to convert get_merge_bases(), in_merge_bases() and all its > revision walking code to take a repository argument. We'll see who gets there first [1] ;-). It does not really matter (and I

Re: The state of the object store series

2018-06-19 Thread Stefan Beller
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:37 PM Jonathan Tan wrote: > > > Floating on the mailing list, not cooking yet: > > One more is my bitmap one here: Oh right. Thanks for writing the series! When writing this I dabbled back and forth whether I only present the series that are on the critical path to

Re: The state of the object store series

2018-06-19 Thread Jonathan Tan
> Floating on the mailing list, not cooking yet: One more is my bitmap one here: https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1528397984.git.jonathanta...@google.com/ It's not in any branch yet, as far as I can tell, so I've just sent out an e-mail letting Junio know [1]. [1]