Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2012, #04; Sun, 16)

2012-12-18 Thread Joachim Schmitz
Matt Kraai wrote: Junio C Hamano wrote: It could turn out that we may be able to get rid of sys/param.h altogether, but one step at a time. Inputs from people on minority platforms are very much appreciated---does your platform build fine when the inclusion of the file is removed from

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2012, #04; Sun, 16)

2012-12-18 Thread Johannes Sixt
Junio C Hamano wrote: It could turn out that we may be able to get rid of sys/param.h altogether, but one step at a time. Inputs from people on minority platforms are very much appreciated---does your platform build fine when the inclusion of the file is removed from git-compat-util.h?

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2012, #04; Sun, 16)

2012-12-17 Thread Matt Kraai
Junio C Hamano wrote: It could turn out that we may be able to get rid of sys/param.h altogether, but one step at a time. Inputs from people on minority platforms are very much appreciated---does your platform build fine when the inclusion of the file is removed from git-compat-util.h? QNX