Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2014, #04; Wed, 12)

2014-02-14 Thread brian m. carlson
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:59:41PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: * bc/gpg-sign-everywhere (2014-02-11) 9 commits - pull: add the --gpg-sign option. - rebase: add the --gpg-sign option - rebase: parse options in stuck-long mode - rebase: don't try to match -M option - rebase: remove

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2014, #04; Wed, 12)

2014-02-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes: Changes to some scripted Porcelains use unsafe variable substitutions and still need to be tightened. Will merge to 'next'. Junio, did you want a reroll with that fixed commit message, or will you fix it up yourself? I haven't

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2014, #04; Wed, 12)

2014-02-14 Thread Andrew Eikum
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:59:41PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: As a workaround to make life easier for third-party tools, the upcoming major release will be called Git 1.9.0 (not Git 1.9). The first maintenance release for it will be Git 1.9.1, and the major release after Git 1.9.0 will

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2014, #04; Wed, 12)

2014-02-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
Andrew Eikum aei...@codeweavers.com writes: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:59:41PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: As a workaround to make life easier for third-party tools, the upcoming major release will be called Git 1.9.0 (not Git 1.9). The first maintenance release for it will be Git 1.9.1, and

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2014, #04; Wed, 12)

2014-02-14 Thread Andrew Eikum
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:10:05PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: Andrew Eikum aei...@codeweavers.com writes: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:59:41PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: As a workaround to make life easier for third-party tools, the upcoming major release will be called Git 1.9.0 (not

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2014, #04; Wed, 12)

2014-02-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
Andrew Eikum aei...@codeweavers.com writes: My worry is having 2. hang around for another decade or longer. I'd rather see X.0.0 denote a major feature release (currently represented as 1.X.0), with X.Y.0 for minor enhancements and X.Y.Z for bugfix. We need three categories: (1) potentially

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2014, #04; Wed, 12)

2014-02-14 Thread Andrew Eikum
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:08:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: Andrew Eikum aei...@codeweavers.com writes: My worry is having 2. hang around for another decade or longer. I'd rather see X.0.0 denote a major feature release (currently represented as 1.X.0), with X.Y.0 for minor