Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
* tr/test-v-and-v-subtest-only (2013-06-18) 8 commits
- test-lib: support running tests under valgrind in parallel
- test-lib: allow prefixing a custom string before ok N etc.
- test-lib: valgrind for only tests matching a pattern
- test-lib:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Because the implementation is too ugly.
I know :) The only reason I sent it with code is because I didn't get
any responses to an email without code. If you agree that it is a
useful feature, we have to figure out a beautiful implementation.
I would however can imagine
Junio C Hamano wrote:
* rr/triangle-push-fix (2013-06-20) 9 commits
- push: honor branch.*.push
- SQUASH??? fix git-config push.default description
- SQUASH??? minimum simple safety fix-up
- t/t5528-push-default: test pushdefault workflows
- t/t5528-push-default: generalize test_push_*
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Four topics are awaiting review (they're important to me in this order):
- rr/for-each-ref-pretty at $gmane/227057.
No comment on this at this moment.
- rr/describe-contains-all at $gmane/228278.
This may overlap with a topic in flight (but
Junio C Hamano wrote:
- rr/describe-contains-all at $gmane/228278.
This may overlap with a topic in flight (but I didn't look at it).
Let me know if I can do anything to make it easier for you. I'm quite
excited about this one.
- rr/mixed-case-aliases at $gmane/227959.
Personally, not
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
... I've noticed a significant decline in
list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been
reviewed.
Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening.
I actually think all the usual suspects (I could name them, but I
Junio C Hamano wrote:
... I've noticed a significant decline in
list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been
reviewed.
Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening.
Observer bias. To verify either claim, could you run some stats on
the ML archives [1] and report
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
artag...@gmail.com wrote:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
... I've noticed a significant decline in
list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been
reviewed.
Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening.
Observer bias. To
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
... I've noticed a significant decline in
list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been
reviewed.
Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening.
Observer bias. To verify either claim, could you
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Unfortunately, I tend to become bottleneck more often than you do,
so I do not think that would be a good use of my time.
Besides, as Antoine points out, those numbers might well be useless
(or worse, misleading). It's probably not worth the effort.
Which ones went
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
- rr/describe-contains-all at $gmane/228278.
This may overlap with a topic in flight (but I didn't look at it).
Let me know if I can do anything to make it easier for you. I'm quite
excited about this one.
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
