(now without HTML formatting)
I am new to git, so sorry If I overlooked something.
I think there might be a race in ref_transaction_commit() when
deleting references.
/* Perform deletes now that updates are safely completed */
for (i = 0; i n; i++) {
struct ref_update *update = updates[i];
On 03/31/2014 07:56 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
I am new to git, so sorry If I overlooked something.
I think there might be a race in ref_transaction_commit() when
deleting references.
/* Perform deletes now that updates are safely completed */
for (i = 0; i n; i++) {
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
* nd/gc-aggressive (2014-03-17) 4 commits
- gc --aggressive: three phase repacking
- gc --aggressive: make --depth configurable
- pack-objects: support --keep
- environment.c:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
* nd/gc-aggressive (2014-03-17) 4 commits
- gc --aggressive: three phase repacking
- gc --aggressive: make --depth configurable
- pack-objects: support --keep
- environment.c: fix constness for odb_pack_keep()
Using
On 03/28/2014 11:21 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'.
Junio,
Have you overlooked my ref-transactions series [1], or just not gotten
to it yet?
If
5 matches
Mail list logo