Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-31 Thread Ronnie Sahlberg
(now without HTML formatting) I am new to git, so sorry If I overlooked something. I think there might be a race in ref_transaction_commit() when deleting references. /* Perform deletes now that updates are safely completed */ for (i = 0; i n; i++) { struct ref_update *update = updates[i];

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-31 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 03/31/2014 07:56 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote: I am new to git, so sorry If I overlooked something. I think there might be a race in ref_transaction_commit() when deleting references. /* Perform deletes now that updates are safely completed */ for (i = 0; i n; i++) {

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-31 Thread Junio C Hamano
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: * nd/gc-aggressive (2014-03-17) 4 commits - gc --aggressive: three phase repacking - gc --aggressive: make --depth configurable - pack-objects: support --keep - environment.c:

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-29 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: * nd/gc-aggressive (2014-03-17) 4 commits - gc --aggressive: three phase repacking - gc --aggressive: make --depth configurable - pack-objects: support --keep - environment.c: fix constness for odb_pack_keep() Using

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #07; Fri, 28)

2014-03-28 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 03/28/2014 11:21 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. Junio, Have you overlooked my ref-transactions series [1], or just not gotten to it yet? If