Re: doc: prefer 'stash push' over 'stash save'
You probably already noticed this was my fault for filtering the patch through Gmail's GUI. I did also push a replacement which hopefully does apply. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Junio C Hamanowrote: > Jonathan Nieder writes: > >> Phil Hord wrote: >> >>> Although `git stash save` was deprecated recently, some parts of the >>> documentation still refer to it instead of `push`. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Phil Hord >>> --- >>> Documentation/git-stash.txt | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder >> Thanks. > > Heh, this does not even apply to 8be661007 that it claims to apply > on top of, which is contained in fd2ebf14 ("stash: mark "git stash > save" deprecated in the man page", 2017-10-22). > > I've wiggled it in, so there is no need to resend, but next time > please be careful when sending the patch and also when sending a > reviewed-by.
Re: doc: prefer 'stash push' over 'stash save'
Jonathan Niederwrites: > Phil Hord wrote: > >> Although `git stash save` was deprecated recently, some parts of the >> documentation still refer to it instead of `push`. >> >> Signed-off-by: Phil Hord >> --- >> Documentation/git-stash.txt | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder > Thanks. Heh, this does not even apply to 8be661007 that it claims to apply on top of, which is contained in fd2ebf14 ("stash: mark "git stash save" deprecated in the man page", 2017-10-22). I've wiggled it in, so there is no need to resend, but next time please be careful when sending the patch and also when sending a reviewed-by.
Re: doc: prefer 'stash push' over 'stash save'
Phil Hord wrote: > Although `git stash save` was deprecated recently, some parts of the > documentation still refer to it instead of `push`. > > Signed-off-by: Phil Hord> --- > Documentation/git-stash.txt | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder Thanks.