Left off a citation to an old thread.
-Original Message-
From: Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 2:25 PM
I may need to be nudged in a better direction, but please try to
understand my intentions.
I am facing a situation where I would like to use git bundle
Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US) jason.j.pyeron@mail.mil writes:
In this situation we should assume that the bundle does not have
any content which is already in the public repository, that is it
has the minimum data to make it pass a git bundle verify from the
public repositories point of view.
-Original Message-
From: Felipe Contreras
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:20 PM
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)
jason.j.pyeron@mail.mil wrote:
I may need to be nudged in a better direction, but please try to
understand my intentions.
I am
-Original Message-
From: Junio C Hamano
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:38 PM
Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US) writes:
In this situation we should assume that the bundle does not have
any content which is already in the public repository, that is it
has the minimum data to make it
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Bash
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:56 PM
- Original Message -
From: Jason J CTR Pyeron (US)
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 2:24:54 PM
Subject: git bundle format
I am facing a situation where I would like to use git bundle but
- Original Message -
From: Jason J CTR Pyeron (US) jason.j.pyeron@mail.mil
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 4:06:59 PM
Subject: RE: git bundle format [OT]
First, a shot out of left field: how about a patch based workflow?
(similar to the mailing list, just replace email
6 matches
Mail list logo
