On 10/19/2012 10:13 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Thiago Farina wrote:
[...]
With some structure like:
include/git.h
src/git.c
...
whatever.
[...]
Junio- is it reasonable to expect the directory-restructuring by 2.0?
I actually hate
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Thiago Farina wrote:
[...]
With some structure like:
include/git.h
src/git.c
...
whatever.
[...]
Junio- is it reasonable to expect the directory-restructuring by 2.0?
I actually hate include/git.h vs src/git.c; you have distinction
Nicolas Sebrecht nicolas.s@gmx.fr writes:
Do you expect one big merge of a very stable libgit2 at some point?
I don't think there's any need to merge libgit2 into the git project
source. As a library, it should be perfectly usable as a project of its
own, just like libcurl and libz.
d...@cray.com writes:
Nicolas Sebrecht nicolas.s@gmx.fr writes:
Do you expect one big merge of a very stable libgit2 at some point?
I don't think there's any need to merge libgit2 into the git project
source. As a library, it should be perfectly usable as a project of its
own, just
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
And the last one should really be a longer term item. It is more
important for its codebase to get mature and robust, and that can
only happen by various projects and products (e.g. GitHub for Mac)
using it to improve it. I do not think subtree (or
d...@cray.com writes:
I am hoping to move git-subtree into core once it performs a little
better and I've fixed a couple of bugs. Will basing it on libgit2 delay
that process significantly? Six months delay is no problem. 2 years
would be problematic.
I would be happy to be a guinea pig
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
I would be happy to be a guinea pig for libgit2 in order to improve it,
but I don't want to significantly impact git-subtree's move to core.
I'll have to figure out the right balance there given feedback.
I expect it will take some time for libgit2 to
d...@cray.com writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
I would be happy to be a guinea pig for libgit2 in order to improve it,
but I don't want to significantly impact git-subtree's move to core.
I'll have to figure out the right balance there given feedback.
I expect it will take
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Well that's a chicken-and-egg problem, isn't it. How will a library
become widespread unless something uses it?
That something will not be the git core itself. Otherwise we will
lose a stable reference implementation to catch its bugs.
Well, the
The 27/08/12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
d...@cray.com writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
I would be happy to be a guinea pig for libgit2 in order to improve it,
but I don't want to significantly impact git-subtree's move to core.
I'll have to figure out the right balance
I know julio notes about libgit2. Anyway the rpm5 mantainer had
decided to integrate libgit2 recently. Jfi.
Regards
2012/8/25, Nicolas Sebrecht nicolas.s@gmx.fr:
The 25/08/12, Vicent Marti wrote:
The development of libgit2 happens 100% in the open. I don't know what
commercial entity are
Andreas Ericsson a...@op5.se writes:
Politically, I'm not sure how keen the git community is on handing
over control to the core stuff of git to a commercial entity, but it
doesn't seem to be a dying project, so I'd say go ahead and do it.
I do not think commercial-ness of any entity comes
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Looking at the build dependency of libgit2 itself, I do not think
tighter integration of the libgit2 itself into the git-core is not
likely to happen very soon, and also is not necessarily a good thing
to do.
Obviously I meant I think it is not likely
On 08/24/2012 04:02 PM, gree...@obbligato.org wrote:
What is the status of libgit2 WRT the overall git project? I recall
that there was some discussion of basing bits of git on libgit2 once it
matures.
I ask because I'm starting a project to improve the abysmal speed of
git-subtree split.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Andreas Ericsson a...@op5.se wrote:
Politically, I'm not sure how keen the git community is on handing
over control to the core stuff of git to a commercial entity,
The development of libgit2 happens 100% in the open. I don't know what
commercial entity are you
The 25/08/12, Vicent Marti wrote:
The development of libgit2 happens 100% in the open. I don't know what
commercial entity are you talking about, but there are several
companies and independent contributors working on the Library at the
moment.
Right but as far as I'm aware of Junio had
Nicolas Sebrecht nicolas.s@gmx.fr writes:
The 25/08/12, Vicent Marti wrote:
The development of libgit2 happens 100% in the open. I don't know what
commercial entity are you talking about, but there are several
companies and independent contributors working on the Library at the
moment.
17 matches
Mail list logo