On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 12:01 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:41 AM, David Turner
> wrote:
> > Summary: git mktree ought to forbid this, and possibly there ought to be
> > other checks (for instance, when unpacking) to prevent this.
>
> Does fsck detect this (because we ought
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:17:15AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I am somewhat against outright removing the capability to write out
> invalid objects deliberately from these low level tools, because we
> would need a way to easily reproduce bugs in end-user facing tools
> by other people who cla
Jeff King writes:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:41:57AM -0400, David Turner wrote:
>
>> git mktree seems to allow the creation of a tree object with multiple
>> objects of the same name but different SHAs.
>
> Yeah, I don't think we do many quality checks there. Ditto for "git
> hash-object".
I a
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:41:57AM -0400, David Turner wrote:
> git mktree seems to allow the creation of a tree object with multiple
> objects of the same name but different SHAs.
Yeah, I don't think we do many quality checks there. Ditto for "git
hash-object".
The latter goes through index_mem
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:41 AM, David Turner wrote:
> Summary: git mktree ought to forbid this, and possibly there ought to be
> other checks (for instance, when unpacking) to prevent this.
Does fsck detect this (because we ought to fix fsck first if it does not)?
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from
5 matches
Mail list logo