Re: Rebased git-subtree changes

Junio C Hamano writes: > This looks to be of mixed quality. The earlier ones look fairly > finished, while the later ones not so much. > > I am tempted to take up to 06/13 and advance them to 'next', without > the rest. Can you let me know what you've taken up? I have a new set with some fixes

Re: Rebased git-subtree changes

This looks to be of mixed quality. The earlier ones look fairly finished, while the later ones not so much. I am tempted to take up to 06/13 and advance them to 'next', without the rest. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger

Re: Rebased git-subtree changes

"David A. Greene" writes: > Here's a re-send of the git-subtree patches after rebasing onto > master. Hopefully Junio will have better luck applying these. Damn. Sorry, I sent this before getting all of the feedback. Just ignore this sequence and I'll send a fixed version in the future.

Rebased git-subtree changes

Here's a re-send of the git-subtree patches after rebasing onto master. Hopefully Junio will have better luck applying these. -David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo