Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
True. My bad old habit.
An elegant method to do that:
case --some-long-option in $1*) ..; esac
You are almost correct, but you need to realize that I generate
that long case
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Horst von Brand wrote:
Isn't it easier to just use getopt(1)?
Only if GNU getopt is available. On Mac OS X, only the BSD version is
installed by default, which does not handle long options at all.
Please stop! I'm dizzy already!
:-)
Ciao,
Dscho
-
To unsubscribe
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- I don't like the GNU way to abbreviate long options too much...
True. My bad old habit.
An elegant method to do that:
case --some-long-option in $1*) ..; esac
Ciao,
Dscho
-
To unsubscribe
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
True. My bad old habit.
An elegant method to do that:
case --some-long-option in $1*) ..; esac
You are almost correct, but you need to realize that I generate
that long case -s|--s|--so|--som|... chain using a script that
takes all potential
Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Multiple -m options was actually a feature of my version of the patch.
Ah, OK.
I said OK and thought about it again. While thinking about
what is the right inter-message-piece separator for multiple -m
parameters (you use \n), I got a headache. I
5 matches
Mail list logo
