On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:10:13PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > I happened to notice today that this topic needs a minor tweak:
> >
> > -- >8 --
> > Subject: [PATCH] add_delta_base_cache: use list_for_each_safe
> >
> > We may remove elements from the list while we are i
Jeff King writes:
> I happened to notice today that this topic needs a minor tweak:
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] add_delta_base_cache: use list_for_each_safe
>
> We may remove elements from the list while we are iterating,
> which requires using a second temporary pointer. Otherwise
> stepping
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:47:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * jk/delta-base-cache (2016-08-23) 7 commits
> (merged to 'next' on 2016-08-25 at f1c141a)
> + t/perf: add basic perf tests for delta base cache
> + delta_base_cache: use hashmap.h
> + delta_base_cache: drop special treatment o
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
I've started merging topics that h
4 matches
Mail list logo
