Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2016, #07; Fri, 23)

Hi Junio, On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > In your previous kitchen status ("What's cooking") you hinted at a > > possible v2.10.1 soon. I have a couple of bugfixes lined up for Git > > for Windows and would like to

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2016, #07; Fri, 23)

Johannes Schindelin writes: > In your previous kitchen status ("What's cooking") you hinted at a > possible v2.10.1 soon. I have a couple of bugfixes lined up for Git for > Windows and would like to avoid unnecessarily frequent release > engineering... Any more

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2016, #07; Fri, 23)

Johannes Schindelin writes: > Also, I found https://tinyurl.com/gitCal very convenient a URL to point > to, do you plan to update that for v2.11.0? Thanks for reminding. I've barely had enough bandwidth to keep up with the list traffic for the past few weeks, and

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2016, #07; Fri, 23)

Hi Junio, On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > A bunch of topics have graduated to 'next', including a few that > were so far marked as "needs review" or "will hold", as I think > giving them a greater visibility and guinea pigs would be the most > efficient way to get feedback from the

What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2016, #07; Fri, 23)

Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. A bunch of topics have graduated