Re: arch 2.0 first source available (git related)

2005-07-11 Thread Thomas Lord
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 01:31 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > But if the depth will be less than that, won't the user end up with some > (plenty) of the objects duplicated? Some, yes, many, no. It's pretty easy to tune how many, afaict. -t - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs

Re: arch 2.0 first source available (git related)

2005-07-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:36:56PM CEST, I got a letter where Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 21:39 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Dear diary, on Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:20:13PM CEST, I got a letter > > where Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me

Re: arch 2.0 first source available (git related)

2005-07-11 Thread Thomas Lord
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 21:39 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:20:13PM CEST, I got a letter > where Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > The prereq graph is, indeed, an improvement. > ..snip.. > But object retrieval can be potentially as much as lin

Re: arch 2.0 first source available (git related)

2005-07-11 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:20:13PM CEST, I got a letter where Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > The prereq graph is, indeed, an improvement. ..snip.. But object retrieval can be potentially as much as linear to the depth of the prereq graph, right? I don't think any o

Re: arch 2.0 first source available (git related)

2005-07-09 Thread Thomas Lord
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 13:39 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 02:12:27AM CEST, I got a letter > where Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > 2.0 is very much git influenced but it brings some (imo significant) > > improvements to the table. > > Could yo

Re: arch 2.0 first source available (git related)

2005-07-09 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 02:12:27AM CEST, I got a letter where Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > 2.0 is very much git influenced but it brings some (imo significant) > improvements to the table. Could you list some of the things interesting for us? What is the benefit

arch 2.0 first source available (git related)

2005-07-08 Thread Thomas Lord
The first source release and some very early documentation for Arch 2.0 ("revc") is now ready! Web page: Source: Source (tar bundle) SHA1: 9c279f78e57a99d517ccf5b983960620ff6f2cf7