Re: bare vs non-bare <1.7 then >=1.7 ?

2012-11-10 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Enrico Weigelt" Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 8:23 AM Wait, there *is* an usecase for such things, deploying trees (eg. webapps) some server: * application is developed in git * the final production-system tree is maintained in certian branch * a post-update hook acts on a specifi

Re: bare vs non-bare <1.7 then >=1.7 ?

2012-11-10 Thread Enrico Weigelt
> When experimenting in order to train some colleagues, I saw that If I > clone a repository, I couldn't push to it because it was a non-bare > one. > Searchin for some explanations, I found this ressource: > http://www.bitflop.com/document/111 That's just a precaution (technically it's not neces

Re: bare vs non-bare <1.7 then >=1.7 ?

2012-11-08 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 02:26:40PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote: > > When experimenting in order to train some colleagues, I saw that If I > > clone a repository, I couldn't push to it because it was a non-bare > > one. > > Searchin for some explanations, I found this ressource: > > http://www

Re: bare vs non-bare <1.7 then >=1.7 ?

2012-11-08 Thread Carlos Martin Nieto
Mihamina Rakotomandimby writes: > Hi all, > > We're on the way to have our first project using Git. > We're currently mostly using Hg (90%) & SVN (10%). > > When experimenting in order to train some colleagues, I saw that If I > clone a repository, I couldn't push to it because it was a non-bare

bare vs non-bare <1.7 then >=1.7 ?

2012-11-08 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby
Hi all, We're on the way to have our first project using Git. We're currently mostly using Hg (90%) & SVN (10%). When experimenting in order to train some colleagues, I saw that If I clone a repository, I couldn't push to it because it was a non-bare one. Searchin for some explanations, I foun