On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > not to belabour this (and i'm sure it's *way* too late for that),
> > but fedora has the following packaging scheme. first, there's a
> > bunch of stuff in "git-core", which has no dependencies on any
> > other git-related
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> not to belabour this (and i'm sure it's *way* too late for that),
> but fedora has the following packaging scheme. first, there's a bunch
> of stuff in "git-core", which has no dependencies on any other
> git-related packages.
The split in Fedora between git and
On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > first, here are the executables under /usr/libexec/git-core/ that
> > are unreferenced by that web page, but that should be fine as
> > almost all of them would be considered underlying helpers or
> > utilities (except for
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 03:03:31PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> huh ... well, that raises the question, if tla has been unbuildable
> for that long (possibly for other distros), what is the value in
> continuing to support git-archimport?
>
>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
... snip ...
> > finally, from fedora, i am utterly unable to find a package that
> > provides git-archimport. pretty sure fedora used to have a
> > "git-arch" package but it's not there now.
>
> It hasn't been in Fedora since
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> first, here are the executables under /usr/libexec/git-core/ that
>>> are unreferenced by that web page, but that should be fine as
>>> almost all of them would be considered underlying helpers or
On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > first, here are the executables under /usr/libexec/git-core/ that
> > are unreferenced by that web page, but that should be fine as
> > almost all of them would be considered underlying helpers or
> > utilities (except for
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> first, here are the executables under /usr/libexec/git-core/ that
> are unreferenced by that web page, but that should be fine as almost
> all of them would be considered underlying helpers or utilities
> (except for things like git-subtree, but we're still unclear on its
(related to earlier thread but different enough that i'll start
fresh.)
based on the collection of man page links here:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/
i took a look at how git 2.14.3 is laid out on my fedora 27 system,
particularly all of the executables under
9 matches
Mail list logo
