Re: device files should be handled by git
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 08:27:56PM -0700, Perry Wagle wrote: Hi -- I have a disk image of a small embedded device whose root file system I'd like to check-in to git as a means of distributing its GPL'd software. In that disk image are device files, which GIT studiously ignores. If symlinks are handled (contents being the path that the symlink points at), I don't see why device files can't be handled (contents being the type (char or block) and the major and minor device number). TAR, for example, handles this fine, except that using tar in git sort-of goes against the granularity of the objects being modified (like adding a bunch of extra sd?? devices), such that you are modifying a whole tar ball instead of the individual (device) files. Is there a reason not to handle device files other than its not traditional? That's the only reason given in google or the IRC channel. Thanks! In linux you can't create device files if your not root. On windows those files won't even exists (afaik). Wouldn't this be very unportable and hard to use (meaning that you need to handle your git repo as root or give git setuid root)? -- Med vänliga hälsningar Fredrik Gustafsson tel: 0733-608274 e-post: iv...@iveqy.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: device files should be handled by git
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Fredrik Gustafsson iv...@iveqy.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 08:27:56PM -0700, Perry Wagle wrote: Is there a reason not to handle device files other than its not traditional? That's the only reason given in google or the IRC channel. In linux you can't create device files if your not root. On windows those files won't even exists (afaik). Wouldn't this be very unportable and hard to use (meaning that you need to handle your git repo as root or give git setuid root)? Device files will probably never be supported by Git for the reasons mentioned by Fredrik. If anything, etckeeper (http://joeyh.name/code/etckeeper/) would be a much more appropriate place to support this, although I don't think it currently does. Alternatively, you could follow the suggestions of http://superuser.com/questions/440873/git-unable-add-device-file (and elsewhere), and write a script for generating the device files, rather than storing them as-is. ...Johan -- Johan Herland, jo...@herland.net www.herland.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
device files should be handled by git
Hi -- I have a disk image of a small embedded device whose root file system I'd like to check-in to git as a means of distributing its GPL'd software. In that disk image are device files, which GIT studiously ignores. If symlinks are handled (contents being the path that the symlink points at), I don't see why device files can't be handled (contents being the type (char or block) and the major and minor device number). TAR, for example, handles this fine, except that using tar in git sort-of goes against the granularity of the objects being modified (like adding a bunch of extra sd?? devices), such that you are modifying a whole tar ball instead of the individual (device) files. Is there a reason not to handle device files other than its not traditional? That's the only reason given in google or the IRC channel. Thanks! -- Perry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
