Re: git-svn: Use prefix by default?

refnames can and should be fixed, by making git-svn's --prefix default to adding an extra level below refs/remotes. So now my question is: If using a prefix is so healthy for git's branch tracking conventions, why doesn't git-svn default to use some prefix like 'origin' or something when

git-svn: Use prefix by default?

-bar set up to track remote branch feat-bar from mirror. Voila, worked on the first try. And no more warnings about ambiguous refnames. So now my question is: If using a prefix is so healthy for git's branch tracking conventions, why doesn't git-svn default to use some prefix like 'origin