thezbyg closed pull request #1198: AMQ-9472 Add test for wildcard producer
breaking authorization
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
cshannon commented on PR #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198#issuecomment-2047943899
Bug fix PR opened at https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1200
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
mattrpav commented on PR #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198#issuecomment-2047728387
@thezbyg thank you for the detailed report and staying with it while we work
through your scenario to find the bug. A tricky edge case!
--
This is an automated message from the
cshannon commented on PR #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198#issuecomment-2047625950
@thezbyg - That is interesting, I do not see that happen when testing some
of the Java STOMP tests we have but it could depend on the client. Regardless,
that processConsumerControl()
thezbyg commented on PR #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198#issuecomment-2046523027
> So this is just how the broker currently works to handle wildcard
subscriptions, since you are publishing to a wildcard topic then any
subscription that matches needs to also
mattrpav commented on PR #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198#issuecomment-2045239359
Looking at the use case, I don't see a scenario where using a wildcard
_topic_ makes the most sense. Topics already of subscriptions, so instead of
creating additional _destinations_
mattrpav commented on PR #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198#issuecomment-2043874595
I think that the behavior should match the destination policy.
1. Wildcard
2. Fully qualified name (authoritative)
I agree, it should be a new flag since we would not
cshannon commented on PR #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198#issuecomment-2043856614
The only other thing i can think of is we could technically change the
behavior of the authorization broker plugin because you could make an argument
that any matching wildcard should
cshannon commented on PR #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198#issuecomment-2043790765
In terms of working around this, the options are pretty much:
1. If you are going to create topics then you need to make sure you have
proper ACLs set up for those topics
cshannon commented on PR #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198#issuecomment-2043752900
This is not really a bug to me, it's a side effect of how wild card
subscriptions work in the broker. The issue here is not with the authorization
plugin or logic but with how
mattrpav commented on PR #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198#issuecomment-2042861290
I was able to reproduce using a stock Apache v6.1.1 build. This appears to
be a 'does not permit' issue and not a 'does not restrict' issue.
--
This is an automated message from the
thezbyg opened a new pull request, #1198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1198
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
12 matches
Mail list logo
