AM-19 commented on PR #1194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1194#issuecomment-2050429370
> Please add a quick unit test
Have Added the same, Please have a look.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AM-19 commented on PR #1194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1194#issuecomment-2050149863
> Please add a quick unit test
Sure, Let me work on that
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
jbonofre commented on code in PR #1194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1194#discussion_r1560916109
##
activemq-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/jmx/HealthView.java:
##
@@ -167,6 +169,25 @@ public List healthList() throws Exception {
}
jbonofre commented on PR #1194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1194#issuecomment-2049540751
> It seems we already have a check for File system usage.
We have a check on the system usage, but not on the cursor.
It's not super critical.
--
This is an automated
mattrpav commented on code in PR #1194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1194#discussion_r1560887925
##
activemq-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/jmx/HealthView.java:
##
@@ -167,6 +169,25 @@ public List healthList() throws Exception {
}
AM-19 commented on PR #1194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1194#issuecomment-2049205082
It seems we already have a check for File system usage.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
jbonofre commented on PR #1194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1194#issuecomment-2049196650
For JDBC yes, but no test on KahaDB. We can check the system usage for
instance to see if the filesystem is not almost full.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
AM-19 commented on PR #1194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1194#issuecomment-2049172132
> This first step checking the transports looks good to me. I would also
check the storage service.
Ideally the above mentioned code for JDBC Persistence check will work, with
the
jbonofre commented on PR #1194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1194#issuecomment-2049061906
This first step checking the transports looks good to me. I would also check
the storage service.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
AM-19 commented on PR #1192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1192#issuecomment-2028855845
Hello @jbonofre
Have Re-opened as #1194
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Thanks
Anubhav
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
AM-19 closed pull request #1192: [AMQ-9447] Added Logic to check underlying
transport connector limits
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1192
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
jbonofre commented on PR #1192:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1192#issuecomment-2028824352
That's a good start, on Tcp transport. I will add additional more "specific"
transport (like http/https/ws transport).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
12 matches
Mail list logo
