[GitHub] [arrow] tianchen92 commented on pull request #6433: ARROW-7495: [Java] Remove "empty" concept from ArrowBuf, replace with custom referencemanager

2020-05-26 Thread GitBox
tianchen92 commented on pull request #6433: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6433#issuecomment-633778149 > @tianchen92 can you rebase this once? I will merge then. Thanks, rebased:) This is an automated

[GitHub] [arrow] tianchen92 commented on pull request #6433: ARROW-7495: [Java] Remove "empty" concept from ArrowBuf, replace with custom referencemanager

2020-05-20 Thread GitBox
tianchen92 commented on pull request #6433: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6433#issuecomment-631284400 > include a test which ensures that the Netty Allocator returns an empty-behaving byte buffer when users allocate a zero byte buffer Thanks jacques, I created

[GitHub] [arrow] tianchen92 commented on pull request #6433: ARROW-7495: [Java] Remove "empty" concept from ArrowBuf, replace with custom referencemanager

2020-05-18 Thread GitBox
tianchen92 commented on pull request #6433: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6433#issuecomment-630540722 > > Good suggestion, seems empty ArrowBuf was used in vectors before populating data. I have added a set of tests in TestValueVector. > > The tests you added are all

[GitHub] [arrow] tianchen92 commented on pull request #6433: ARROW-7495: [Java] Remove "empty" concept from ArrowBuf, replace with custom referencemanager

2020-05-08 Thread GitBox
tianchen92 commented on pull request #6433: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6433#issuecomment-625704614 > I think it would be good to have a set of tests ensuring that the behavior of the empty buffer is consistent. For example, refcnt, release/allocate, etc. That way, if

[GitHub] [arrow] tianchen92 commented on pull request #6433: ARROW-7495: [Java] Remove "empty" concept from ArrowBuf, replace with custom referencemanager

2020-05-06 Thread GitBox
tianchen92 commented on pull request #6433: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6433#issuecomment-624480936 > @tianchen92 , can you please revise thia? Looks like the work is completed ok, revised, thanks! This