tustvold commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2144828847
`label_issue.py` automatically added labels {'arrow'} from #5769
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
tustvold commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2144828720
`label_issue.py` automatically added labels {'parquet'} from #5769
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
alamb commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2141612597
> @alamb any idea on when
[52.0.0](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5688) will be deployed?
The plan as I understand it is next week
--
This is an automated
david542542 commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2140998763
@alamb any idea on when https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5688 will
be deployed?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
tustvold closed issue #5654: Rust Interval definition incorrect
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
alamb commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2117975046
Proposed PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/5769
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
alamb commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2108732883
We are holding the [`52.0.0` release for
this](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5688). I expect it will be
available in about 2 weeks but no promises, etc
--
This is an
david542542 commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2108722445
That's great to know. Any idea on the ETA on this fix?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
tustvold commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2108044769
It turns out the reason we didn't detect this with our integration tests, is
that they were actually using different, correct, logic for constructing the
expected values from the
alamb commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2075207796
Typing down some things that @tustvold told me today:
1. we think the tests ensure the data round trips but does not actually
ensure both ends interpret them in the same way
tustvold commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2074140467
One way to avoid this leading to subtle downstream breakage might be to do
something along the lines of https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3125
--
This is an automated
pitrou commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2060833519
> @pitrou do you know if the integration tests cover the interval types?
Yes, they do.
avantgardnerio commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2060058201
> @avantgardnerio as the author of #2235 which appears to have switched
these round, perhaps you could weigh in here
Honestly, I don't recall the reasoning. I know at
tustvold commented on issue #5654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5654#issuecomment-2060012409
@pitrou do you know if the integration tests cover the interval types?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
14 matches
Mail list logo
