jorgecarleitao edited a comment on pull request #9301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9301#issuecomment-766088562
On another side note, this just re-inforces the need to mark
`PrimitiveArray::value` as `unsafe`.
jorgecarleitao edited a comment on pull request #9301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9301#issuecomment-766163142
Now I get your point. On the PR description, I mention two _independent_
sources of unsoundness:
* we are using indices from null slots
* we are not
jorgecarleitao edited a comment on pull request #9301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9301#issuecomment-766163142
Now I get your point. On the PR description, I mention two _independent_
sources of unsoundness:
* we are using indices from null slots
* we are not
jorgecarleitao edited a comment on pull request #9301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9301#issuecomment-766163142
Now I get your point. On the PR description, I mention to _independent_
sources of unsoundness:
* we are using indices from null slots
* we are not
jorgecarleitao edited a comment on pull request #9301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9301#issuecomment-766163142
Now I get your point. On the PR description, I mention to _independent_
sources of unsoundness:
* we are using indices from null slots
* we are not
jorgecarleitao edited a comment on pull request #9301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9301#issuecomment-766163142
Now I get your point. On the PR description, I mention to _independent_
sources of unsoundness:
* we are using indices from null slots
* we are not
jorgecarleitao edited a comment on pull request #9301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9301#issuecomment-766088562
On a side note, this explains why I was unable to beat `take` when I tried
to replace it by `MutableArray`.
On another side note, this just re-inforces the