wesm edited a comment on pull request #7593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7593#issuecomment-653042125
OK, do you have an idea for a prefix for a function that works either on
BinaryArray or StringArray? This could also be handled with aliases so we could
have `utf8_contains_ex
wesm edited a comment on pull request #7593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7593#issuecomment-652053744
I also propose to rename the function from "contains_exact" to
"utf8_contains". ~~I'm pushing that change here shortly~~. Or should we call it
"binary_contains" / "string_cont
wesm edited a comment on pull request #7593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7593#issuecomment-652053744
I also propose to rename the function from "contains_exact" to
"utf8_contains". ~~I'm pushing that change here shortly~~. Or should we call it
"binary_contains" / "string_cont
wesm edited a comment on pull request #7593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7593#issuecomment-652053744
I also propose to rename the function from "contains_exact" to
"utf8_contains". ~~I'm pushing that change here shortly~~. Or should we call it
"binary_contains" / "string_cont
wesm edited a comment on pull request #7593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7593#issuecomment-652053744
I also propose to rename the function from "contains_exact" to
"utf8_contains". I'm pushing that change here shortly. Or should we call it
"BinaryContains" since it will work
wesm edited a comment on pull request #7593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7593#issuecomment-652053744
I also propose to rename the function from "contains_exact" to
"utf8_contains". I'm pushing that change here shortly. Or should we call it
"binary_contains" / "string_contains
wesm edited a comment on pull request #7593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7593#issuecomment-651849432
@xhochy chunked arrays should be handled automatically by the function
executors. I will take a look.
This i
