Re: [PR] docs: Add instruction to build [datafusion]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on PR #14694: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#issuecomment-2684699147 I think we forgot to update the index name too: - https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14890 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

Re: [PR] docs: Add instruction to build [datafusion]

2025-02-23 Thread via GitHub
comphead merged PR #14694: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf

Re: [PR] docs: Add instruction to build [datafusion]

2025-02-22 Thread via GitHub
dentiny commented on code in PR #14694: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#discussion_r1966652960 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/development_environment.md: ## @@ -37,6 +37,22 @@ developing DataFusion in an isolated environment either locally or remote if de

Re: [PR] docs: Add instruction to build [datafusion]

2025-02-22 Thread via GitHub
dentiny commented on code in PR #14694: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#discussion_r1966653578 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md: ## @@ -216,3 +216,23 @@ The good thing about open code and open development is that any issues in one ch Pull reques

Re: [PR] docs: Add instruction to build [datafusion]

2025-02-17 Thread via GitHub
comphead commented on code in PR #14694: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#discussion_r1958646842 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/development_environment.md: ## @@ -37,6 +37,22 @@ developing DataFusion in an isolated environment either locally or remote if d

Re: [PR] docs: Add instruction to build [datafusion]

2025-02-16 Thread via GitHub
dentiny commented on code in PR #14694: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#discussion_r1957718072 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md: ## @@ -216,3 +216,23 @@ The good thing about open code and open development is that any issues in one ch Pull reques

Re: [PR] docs: Add instruction to build [datafusion]

2025-02-16 Thread via GitHub
dentiny commented on PR #14694: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#issuecomment-2662225775 > I have some other thought on making this easier to find. What do you think? Both sounds good to me! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

Re: [PR] docs: Add instruction to build [datafusion]

2025-02-16 Thread via GitHub
dentiny commented on code in PR #14694: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#discussion_r1957683279 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md: ## @@ -216,3 +216,23 @@ The good thing about open code and open development is that any issues in one ch Pull reques

Re: [PR] docs: Add instruction to build [datafusion]

2025-02-16 Thread via GitHub
alamb commented on code in PR #14694: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#discussion_r1957300909 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md: ## @@ -216,3 +216,23 @@ The good thing about open code and open development is that any issues in one ch Pull requests

Re: [PR] docs: Add instruction to build [datafusion]

2025-02-15 Thread via GitHub
dentiny commented on code in PR #14694: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#discussion_r1957260006 ## docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md: ## @@ -216,3 +216,23 @@ The good thing about open code and open development is that any issues in one ch Pull reques